2014 Annual Review
Civilization: Why are we waiting?
Back in February we saw Putin's Cossacks beating up Pussy Riot, the punk group, with whips, pepper spray and not a few kicks and punches because they dared to protest at the Sochi Winter Olympics, we may wonder how much longer we will have to wait for a civilized world to arrive.
Clearly, the Winter Olympics Committee did not want to play any part in the forward march of civilization, preferring to say nothing about the beating of Pussy Riot and pretended it had nothing to do with sport. Obviously, sport transcends protest, existing as it does in some Elysian Field, an enclave reserved for gods and heroes, a place where the nasty, loathsome idiocy of Putin's Russia shall not enter and upset the delicate sensibilities of elite athletes and their sponsors.
Here in the West, we like to think we are far more civilized. How can we be, when we allow ourselves to be led by philistines, indifferent to anything that doesn't turn a penny for them or those they serve. It's an amazing delusion that allows Tony Blair to walk in our midst, to masquerade as a peace envoy for the Middle East, to trot across the globe offering 'reputational advice' to those whose lives are without repute. "Tough up, it will pass", Blair told Rebekah Brooks, who was under siege over the despicable hacking of Milly Dowler's phone. What sort of sick mind takes advice from the man who lied to the nation about weapons of mass destruction. A man who allowed the moron George Bush to use him as a foot stool.
No Tony, it will not pass, Iraq is a basket case, Afghanistan is worse, the suffering of its people immense, lingering like a chronic illness, while you smugly take tea with the barbaric Saudi royal family and discuss their contribution to global terrorism and the marvellous distorting effects of Wahhabism. Yes, 'King' Abdullah, what a wonderful client, how he and Mr Putin would enjoy a tea together. Abdullah believes that homosexuals should be burnt, stoned or thrown from mountains or tall buildings. And like all good believers he puts his money where his mouth is, funding DVDs and books for a host of British schools to share his vile message with young muslims here.
Talking of vile messages, Gambian President Yahya Jammeh gets an A star:
“We will fight these vermins called homosexuals or gays the same way we are fighting malaria-causing mosquitoes, if not more aggressively,” Jammeh said.
“As far as I am concerned, LGBT can only stand for Leprosy, Gonorrhoea, Bacteria and Tuberculosis; all of which are detrimental to human existence.”
It's not just gays that Jammeh dislikes, it's anyone who disagrees with him, he's a nasty man. The UN reports that the hallmark of his regime is "forced disappearances, illegal detention, denial of due process, and the abuse and harassment of critics."
The Gambia is the smallest country in Africa but its governance is typical across the continent. Elsewhere across the globe, everywhere we look, we see the same evidence of uncivilized conduct.
We see Kim Jong-un in North Korea feeding his relatives to savage dogs, locking up over 120,000 people in torture camps; while he spends a fortune on luxury goods, behaving like a comic book hero while 'his people' starve. Savage dogs, Cortez was fond of feeding the Aztecs live to his dogs but that was 500 years ago and we are far more enlightened now, well some of us are.
In Sudan, a women sits shackled in a cesspool of a prison, clutching her new born baby and awaiting 100 lashes, before being hung for refusing to relinquish her Christian faith. The Sharia court have postponed her lashing, so that she can recover properly from child birth - lunatics.
In India, two young girls are gang raped and hung from a tree near their village, the police couldn't be bothered to investigate because the girls were from a low caste.
In Pakistan, a young women was stoned by 20 members of her own family. This was a so-called honour killing, the family disagreed with her choice of husband. The police stood by and watched.
And here in the UK, a Nigerian women faces deportation and the certainty that her four year old daughter will face genital mutilation once back in the bosom of the village family. She also fears death for herself since converting to Christianity whilst living in the UK. The Home Office says the woman's case has no merit.
All of which leaves us wondering, how long must we wait for a more civilized world - perhaps when people like Tony Blair stop pimping for a living and use their influence for the common good.
Who is wasting public money?
January
Austerity, our nutty chancellor tells us, is all we can hope for, until his marvelous policies free us from the spendthrift legacy of New Labour.
Acting Lessons
Someone needs to tell our misspending politicians and civil servants about this austerity business. Reports are circulating that £10,000 has been spent on acting lessons, provided by Rada, for some of our politicians. They apparently needed some help with their lamentable parliamentary delivery since they were not quite reaching the standard required by the ventriloquists' union.
Shameful portraits
Portraits of politicians including Iain Duncan Smith, Diane Abbott and Ken Clarke have cost the taxpayer £250,000. Paying an artist thousands of pounds to immortalise people who further down the road will not even rate a footnote in history is beyond a waste of money, it's a hanging offence. Take a look at the artist's efforts for Diane Abbott, this masterpiece is priced at £11,500.
Abbott's portrait is no more less awful than many others by the same pavement artist. However, it really is mocking the public to hang portraits of failed party leaders like T. Blair, P. Ashdown and C. Kennedy; a grasping liar, a philanderer, and a drunk.
Utility: What's an old person worth?
February
If you are old, government bean counters are busy asking themselves if you've had a 'fair innings', making judgments about what you are entitled to. Things like life saving drugs, for instance, they need a measuring stick - and they've got one - it's called a QALY.
QALY stands for ‘quality adjusted life year’ and works like this:
One QALY equals one year of perfect health, or two years of 50 per cent perfect health or four years of 25 per cent perfect health. If the cost per QALY is below £20,000, the treatment is deemed cost effective and approved. Once the cost goes beyond £30,000 per year, forget it, you'll have to soldier on without the medication.
The problem here is not the financial calculation itself so much as the thinking behind it, which may be described as social darwinism - i.e. someone is deciding that your social contribution is negative. Clearly, all those past credits you thought you had stored up are being discounted.
Britain at DEF-CON 1
Your Prime Minister announced at a Downing Street press conference, in September, that we were facing "a greater and deeper threat to our security than we have known before". Perhaps the nasty work of the IRA in the 70s and 80s passed our leader by. We may also wonder why he chooses to ignore the terror in Northern Ireland today, that's been ongoing for the past four years but the press here rarely, if ever, mention happenings across the water, unless it involves marching bands.
Theresa May told us the threat level was now "severe" meaning a terrorist attack from Islamic State (IS) was "highly likely". Although the home secretary, stressed there was no specific intelligence. "The increase in the threat level is related to developments in Syria and Iraq where terrorist groups are planning attacks against the west."
These announcements from May and Cameron were really quite silly. Saying we face a severe threat, which is highly likely is tantamount to betting on every horse in a race.
Meanwhile the nastiness of the Assad regime in Syria continues apace and the media here continue to ignore it, just like they ignore Northern Ireland. A suspicious mind might conclude that editors have been told to focus on more important matters like shopping frenzies and obesity.
Politics
Here in the UK politics became interesting again. The sight of the three main party leaders turning up in the last hours of the Scottish Referendum campaign, promising the Earth for a No vote, was ridiculous. Well, Westminster got its No vote but it lost Scotland.
UKIP set the political agenda for the other parties, with their reductionist philosophy. The shortage of affordable homes, the shortage of hospital beds, in fact all shortages were the fault of immigrants and if the UK was not a member of the EU, then their would be no immigrant problem and therefore, no shortages.
Ed Miliband's One Nation Labour Party are still struggling to find something remotely interesting to say and still struggling to differentiate themselves from the Tory Party. However, if you want to know what Labour will do in office, just read the Tory party manifesto.
The Lib-Dems, otherwise known as the Zombie Party, have been wiped out in the Euro elections, wiped out in the local elections and wiped out in by-elections. You don't need to bookmaker to tell you how things will go for the Zombies next May.
The child sex abuse inquiry
November
Theresa May, our less than astute home secretary has turned her brief to set up an inquiry into historic child sex abuse into a shambles. Twice now she has failed to select a chair person who is truly independent of the nasty people under investigation. First off, we had May or rather her Home Office minions, trying it on with Lady Butler-Sloss, the sister of Nigel Havers - who was the attorney general during the period to be investigated. Next, they thought they could get away with Fiona Woolf, a neighbour and dinning chum of ex-Home Secretary, Leon Brittan and his wife. Once the public became aware of this cosy relationship, the Home Office made a pathetic attempt to down play the relationship between Wolfe and the Brittans. Woolf resigned.
The failure to select an independent chair person can be explained variously. It may be all part of an establishment attempt to misdirect and manage outcomes, along the lines of most government inquiries, where two years and more are spent data churning, interviewing, scapegoating, report writing and then not implementing any of the of the recommendations that follow.
This intended inquiry is about more than ex-MPs and government ministers hiding in the shadows of the Charlton Club, it’s about institutional failure as well. The behaviour of the police, NHS, schools, social workers, children’s charities, politicians and local authorities towards victims who reported their abuse. However, the Home Office itself is right in the frame of this inquiry and indeed it was that department which ‘lost’ the Geoffrey Dicken’s dossier, that forced the government into this inquiry.
Muddying the waters
Back in 2013, the Home Office commissioned a review into how it handled abuse allegations between 1979 and 1999. Quite what it reviewed is uncertain since over a hundred documents relating to sex abuse had been ‘lost or destroyed’.In July 2014, Peter Wanless, boss of the NSPCC, was asked by Theresa May to review the Home Office review, as well as, how police and prosecutors responded to complaints. The upshot, Wanless found nothing because there was nothing to be found, that is, he could not find any of the ‘lost’ documents. The point of the Wanless Review may be lost on many people but perhaps he might like to consider a review into how the NSPCC responded to child sex abuse victims of the Westminster buggers between 1979 and 1999? It is almost as if someone was trying to persuade the historic child sex abuse inquiry, still without a chair person , that there’s no point in focussing on the Home Office because they do not know anything.
Update: December, the Home Secretary wrote to all the members of this inquiry to inform them their services were nolonger required. She is now considering setting a full judicial inquiry?
The IPCC takes a hand
It would be nice to hear what the man on the Clapham Omnibus made of the Wanless review and to know whether that man was able to disentangle the announcement that the Independent Police Complaints Commission is to investigate how three police forces dealt with information about paedophiles supplied by Canadian police.This investigation is about to happen because the Essex, North Wales and North Yorkshire police did not deal in a timely or urgent manner with the information supplied. And our own version of the FBI, the National Crime Agency have already apologised for their sloth.
The IPCC says it takes the abuse of children seriously, that’s reassuring. However, this investigation has nothing to do with historic child sex abuse by establishment figures. We already know that the police have an appalling track record in sex abuse cases. The IPCC action is apparently driven by “considerable public concern about how the police deal with sexual offences involving children”.The man on the omnibus may well conclude that there is a connection between Wanless and this investigation, both are designed to reassure the public that something is being done - straight from the first page of the Cynics Handbook, ‘being seen to be doing something’ may be confused with purposeful action and is therefore highly desirable.
Looking at the world through Foster Grants
March
Syria
The carnage in Syria continued. Assad continued to slaughter his own people daily. Two hundred thousand dead in the past three years. All the liberal democracies of the West, hands rung out, devoid of ideas, leaving things to the UN. The UN gave up and now no one mentions Syria anymore, not even in whispers. Deep down in some subterranean Pentagon warren, men in Foster Grants, have run computer models. Syria's carnage is containable, i.e. it will not interfere with business, so no need to get involved.
Ukraine
President Yanukovych, gangster and Russian stooge, fled the Ukraine following mass protests and violence. The Russians took the Crimea and all the liberal democracies said there will be consequences. Vlad the Impaler said get lost. Well, all the liberal democracies have had a rethink. They are now telling Vlad not to take the eastern Ukraine or there will be consequences. The Foster Grant boys have run the computer models again but it's proving difficult - the machine just doesn't know how to add up two sets of hollow consequences. Perhaps they can let Vlad have the eastern Ukraine after all.
Sri Lanka
In Sri Lanka the persecution of the Tamils goes on. A mother and her 13 year old daughter were arrested on suspicion of harbouring a terrorist. It took 150 soldiers to make the arrest. The woman in question has brought much unwelcome media attention to Sri Lanka's butchering President Rajapaksa. She has been mounting a campaign to find her son, who disappeared back in 2009. A UN report from 2012 says that up to 70,000 civilians are unaccounted for. There's been much talk among the liberal democracies of war crimes investigations against the Rajapasksa regime but the Foster Grant boys will not be running any computer models.
Oxfam 'Working for the few'
March
Recently, Oxfam produced a report on economic inequality across the globe and made the following stark observation:
"It is staggering that in the 21st Century, half of the world's population – that's three and a half billion people – own no more than a tiny elite whose numbers could all fit comfortably on a double-decker bus."
Here, in the UK, five families have more wealth than 12.5m citizens, that's the bottom 20% of the population.
These wealthy individuals are the wealth creators, the hard working strivers, they are the few... that everyone else works for.
Now, the boys from the Bullingdon Club would have us believe that such staggering economic inequality is simply a function of wealth creation, i.e those people who are prepared to carry out risk taking investment deserve rich rewards.
There's a minor floor in this argument, the wealthy elite do not take risks, some may be reckless but generally risk takers they are not. They prefer to make their money in a rigged market, where the dice are loaded and the cards are marked - by them.
Oxfam says that growing inequality has been driven by a "power grab" by wealthy elites who have co-opted the political process. This is not just about having the political class in their pockets to further their money grubbing aims but perhaps, more crucially, to ensure that the legal system favours their aims. Nothing exemplifies this more than financial deregulation and a tax system skewed in favour of tax evasion for the wealthy.
When the wealthy elite gather together at the Bilderberg Club or a Davos bash, along with their trousered politicians, they do so to tell the world how things will be. And the message is always the same, maintain the status quo; the fatter the few get, the more dripping there will be for the bread of the rest - well, that's according to the theory of trickle down.
UP